The valve decision is a fucntion of the characteristics of the liquid flowing through them and other considerations.Pinch valves, for example, arenāt suited for vacuum service, and are limited in material of construction options, pressure, temperature ratings, flow characteristics, speeds of response and rangeability, but they do provide a self-cleaning streamlined flow path and a characteristic that resembles a variable Venturi.
Saunders valves and pinch valves have similar features, but I wouldnāt recommend them for vacuum service because the inner vacuum makes it difficult to open them. On positive pressure service, these designs provide good sealing because they have no stuffing boxes. Saunders designs are superior to pinch valves if corrosion-resistant materials are needed, but theyāre inferior if completely unobstructed stream-line flow is desired. Pinch valves are suitable for very low pressure drop services only, while Saunders and wedge plug valves can operate at slightly higher pressures.
Lined butterfly valves are a good choice if the process pressure is high while the valve drop is low.
The angle valve with a scooped-out plug satisfies most requirements, except that its flow characteristics are poor, and itās necessary to purge the stem above the plug to prevent solids from migrating into that area.
Full-ported ball valves provide full pipe opening in their open position, but when throttled, both their flow paths and their pressure recovery characteristics are poor.
Valves that donāt open to the full pipe diameter, but still merit consideration in slurry service include characterized ball valves, the various self-draining designs, the eccentric disc type rotating globes, and the sweep angle valves.
The characterized ball valve, for example, exhibits an improved flow characteristic in comparison with the full-ported ball type. Itās well-suited for process fluids containing fibers or larger particles. The self-draining valve allows slurries to be periodically flushed out of the system. Complete drainage is guaranteed because all surfaces are sloping downstream.
The sweep angle valve, with its wide-radius inlet bend and its Venturi outlet, is similar to the angle slurry valve. Its streamlined non-clogging inner contour minimizes erosion and reduces turbulence. To prevent process fluid from entering the stuffing box, a scraper can be furnished, which can also be flushed with a purge fluid if necessary. The orifice located at the very outlet is built like a choke fitting. Both orifice and plug may be made of abrasion-resistant ceramic or other hard metals.
For slurries with large particles, the ideal orifice shape is a circle, such as that of an iris valve or a jacketed pinch (A).
Orifice size, particle size and required rangeability are interrelated. For any particle size and orifice shape there is a minimum opening below which plugging will occur. To get good rangeability (good control at low flow rates) the valve Īp should be small and constant. One way to provide this is by the use of a āhead box.ā
BƩla LiptƔk
I agree with your suggestions and have an additional point to suggest to Praveen Tandon.
If a slurry is such that it will accumulate particles in the trim of the valve, Iāve found that a fully open command lasting few seconds and issued from time to time (15 to 30 minutes) will clean the internal of the valve, and prevent build up of solids, reestablishing good control characteristics. This command can be obtained via a solenoid valve on the pneumatic line to the actuator or from the DCS. However I wouldnāt suggest this possibility if the valve is equipped with a bellow seal, due to the shortening of its life.
Alberto Rohr, Consultant, Italy
A pinch valve is out because of vacuum. A V-ball valve with hardened trim is the best selection. The valve would be rather small in size, so replacing it eventually should be no problem.
Stephan Gaertner, Sales Engineer, Clipper Contols
āAsk the Expertsā is moderated by BĆ©la LiptĆ”k ([email protected]), editor of the three-volume Instrument Engineerās Handbook, 4th edition (available from Amazon.com) He is the former chief instrument engineer of C&R (later John Brown) and is recipient of ISAās 2005 Life Achievement and Controlās 2001 Hall of Fame award. In this column, he welcomes questions about problems in the fields of process control and automation.
Ā